How to Handle Employee AWOL in the Philippines

AWOL (Absence Without Official Leave) is not automatic grounds for dismissal in the Philippines. To legally terminate an employee for prolonged absence, the employer must prove abandonment of work, which requires two elements: (1) failure to report for work without valid or justifiable reason, and (2) a clear intention to sever the employer-employee relationship. The employer must also follow the twin notice rule under Article 297(b) of the Labor Code.

AWOL vs. Abandonment: The Legal Distinction

Many employers mistakenly treat AWOL and abandonment as the same thing. They are not.

AWOL is a factual description — the employee is absent without filing or obtaining leave approval. AWOL may be caused by emergencies, illness, family problems, or other circumstances the employee could not control.

Abandonment is a legal ground for termination under Article 297(b) of the Labor Code (formerly Article 282), classified as "gross and habitual neglect of duties." The Supreme Court has consistently held that abandonment requires two concurrences:

1. The employee failed to report for work without valid or justifiable reason
2. There is a clear, deliberate, and unjustified intent to sever the employment relationship

The intent to abandon cannot be presumed from mere absence. In King of Kings Transport, Inc. v. Mamac (G.R. No. 166208, June 29, 2007), the Supreme Court emphasized that the employer must prove overt acts showing the employee's clear intention to abandon work. Filing a complaint for illegal dismissal, for instance, negates the claim of abandonment — an employee who wants to sever ties would not be filing a case to get reinstated.

The Twin Notice Rule

Even when the employer has grounds to believe the employee has abandoned their position, the twin notice rule (also called procedural due process) must be followed. The Supreme Court laid out the requirements in King of Kings Transport v. Mamac:

First Notice: Notice to Explain (NTE)

The NTE must:

• State the specific acts or omissions constituting the ground for termination
• Give the employee at least 5 calendar days from receipt to submit a written explanation
• Be served at the employee's last known address if they cannot be reached at the workplace (by registered mail or personal service)

Administrative Hearing

After receiving the employee's explanation (or after the 5-day period lapses without response), the employer must:

• Conduct a hearing or conference, or give the employee an opportunity to respond in writing
• The hearing need not be a formal trial-type proceeding, but the employee must have a meaningful opportunity to be heard

Second Notice: Notice of Decision

The employer must issue a written notice of termination stating:

• The grounds for the decision
• The circumstances considered
• The effective date of termination

Step-by-Step Process for Handling AWOL

Step	Action	Timeline
1	Document the absences — record each day of AWOL in the DTR/attendance system	Daily
2	Attempt to contact the employee — call, text, email. Document all attempts	Days 1-3
3	Send a Return-to-Work notice — via registered mail to last known address	Day 3-5
4	Issue Notice to Explain (NTE) — if employee does not respond or return, send formal NTE via registered mail	After return-to-work notice ignored
5	Wait for response — at least 5 calendar days from receipt of NTE	5+ days
6	Conduct administrative hearing — if employee responds, schedule a hearing. If no response, proceed with decision based on evidence	After response period
7	Issue Notice of Decision — if abandonment is established, issue termination notice with effective date	After hearing/evaluation
8	Process final pay — release within 30 days per DOLE LA 06-20	Within 30 days of separation

Common Mistakes in AWOL Cases

1. Terminating without the twin notice. Even 30 days of AWOL does not eliminate the need for due process. Skipping the NTE and hearing exposes the employer to an illegal dismissal complaint with nominal damages.

2. Treating AWOL as automatic abandonment. The Supreme Court has ruled in numerous cases — including Samarca v. Arc-Men Industries (G.R. No. 146118, 2003) — that mere absence does not constitute abandonment without proof of intent to sever.

3. Not sending notices to the correct address. The NTE and decision notice must reach the employee. If they have moved, use the last known address on file and send by registered mail with return receipt.

4. Failing to document the process. Keep copies of all notices sent, proof of service (registered mail receipts), minutes of hearings, and the final termination decision. This documentation is essential if the employee later files an illegal dismissal complaint.

Related Guides

• Employee Termination Due Process — Complete guide to just cause and authorized cause termination
• Final Pay Computation — What to include in final pay for terminated employees
• Attendance & Timekeeping Rules — DTR requirements and absence management
• What Is the 30-Day Rule for Final Pay? — DOLE advisory on final pay release

Legal References

• Labor Code of the Philippines (PD 442, as amended) — Article 297(b) (Gross and Habitual Neglect of Duties)
• King of Kings Transport, Inc. v. Mamac (G.R. No. 166208, June 29, 2007) — Twin notice requirements, abandonment elements
• Samarca v. Arc-Men Industries, Inc. (G.R. No. 146118, October 8, 2003) — Mere absence insufficient to prove abandonment
• DOLE Labor Advisory No. 06-20 (Series of 2020) — Final pay within 30 days
• Omnibus Rules Implementing the Labor Code, Book V, Rule XXIII — Termination of employment

---

This guide is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, tax, or financial advice. While we strive for accuracy by citing official Philippine laws and government circulars, regulations change. Consult a qualified professional or the relevant government agency for advice specific to your situation.